The Forums on slxdeveloper.com are now retired. The forum archive will remain available for the time being. Thank you for your participation on slxdeveloper.com!
|
|
Client Options - Menus and Toolbars
Posted: 13 Nov 06 4:36 PM
|
fiogf49gjkf0d Were the Add and Remove buttons removed intentionally? If so, is there going to be a hotfix to put them back, or do I have to basically not have any custom menus or toolbars released at any point in time?
If I had to guess, I would say something changed in Sage's thinking. Most likely it's something like this: Every single Menu and Toolbar will show up in this list but you use the release system to determine who sees what, if anything. The only evidence I have is the SLXProfiler trace showing "select * from plugin where type = 14...15" statements gathering every single menu and toolbar plugin during the loading of the Client Options screen.
The good news? Most of the menus and toolbars I don't want belong to the SLX Advanced, Marketing, and other plugins the upgrade process supposedly unreleased according to documentation. I'll simply remove the bundles prior to upgrading and let the upgrade bundle fix the broken parts.
My main concern is any custom menu or toolbar I might possibly implement in the future. Having to remove menus or toolbars altogether isn't my idea of a solution but it's the only thing I could come up with. |
|
|
|
Re: Client Options - Menus and Toolbars
Posted: 14 Nov 06 7:09 AM
|
fiogf49gjkf0d Yes - they were removed intentionally and there is no plan to bring them back.
During early beta, the "up/down" feature was not there as well. I convinced them that we had to have the ability to position items or it would break(almost) all custom use of menus, toolbars, NavBars.
The method you are using is the way to go..
--
rjl |
|
|
|
Re: Client Options - Menus and Toolbars
Posted: 15 Nov 06 1:37 PM
|
fiogf49gjkf0d Thank god, it would have been a nightmare otherwise. Another method I thought of would be to introduce a "hide" menu or toolbar that when placed after the existing would hide the item(s). I'm not entirely sure it would work that way but it should in theory at least. |
|
|
| |
|